Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joanne Coates's avatar

❤️

Expand full comment
søren k. harbel's avatar

So, just so I understand, the curator is born in 1987 and is curating a show that is describing working class Britain from 1989 to 2024? You tell us that you have to understand the curator to understand the show... We appear to have crossed over to a place where the curator's name appears in bigger letters than the names of the photographers that are supposed to be the stars of the show? The captions next to each image appear not to be titles and names of photographers, but minor essays explaining why the photograph is there.... am I getting this right?

In my mind, a good curator is invisible. Their name appears in tiny letters at the bottom of the poster, if at all. The names of the artists appear in larger and a more prominent position above, preferably in bold!

If an extensive knowledge of, supplemented by an in person narrative by the curator is necessary to glue a show together, then the curator has failed in getting the job done, or am I wrong?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts