Discussion about this post

User's avatar
søren k. harbel's avatar

Great post. I am concerned with how we treat legacy and this is another example of just because we can, doesn't mean we should.

I have seen similar examples of late-great-artists being shown to their great disadvantage by those who believe they know how. You cannot possibly take someone who died 20 years ago, when technology was less advanced and have them anticipate what their work might look like today, or 20 years from now.

Lawsuits tell us that deviations from the original are not tolerated among the living, so how can we possibly accept it from heirs, curators, and all the eejits who are using someone-no-longer-with-us' work to live out their inept creative fantasies...

Expand full comment
Kenneth Mills's avatar

Thank you for sharing. Timely, and uncomfortable! One realises we're surrounded by, we're internalising, just such phenomena. Projections, pixels, blown-up versions. Prints can surely carry something, (i want to believe), but your featuring of the chalk / no chalk example haunts.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts